ECA: Amu (unsdcode:98111) vs Latvia: Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, both sexes
ECA: Amu (unsdcode:98111)
93.9%
in 2024
Latvia
101.3%
in 2024
ECA: Amu (unsdcode:98111) rank
62nd
Latvia rank
61st
Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, both sexes over time
- ECA: Amu (unsdcode:98111)
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 101.3% against 93.9% in ECA: Amu (unsdcode:98111), a difference of 7.4%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times ECA: Amu (unsdcode:98111)'s.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
ECA: Amu (unsdcode:98111) ranks 62nd and Latvia ranks 61st of 221 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ECA: Amu (unsdcode:98111) | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.7% | 99.9% | 31.2% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 86.3% | 109.4% | 23.1% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 91.4% | 104.0% | 12.5% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, secondary, both sexes, ECA: Amu (unsdcode:98111) or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 101.3% against 93.9% in ECA: Amu (unsdcode:98111) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, secondary, both sexes between ECA: Amu (unsdcode:98111) and Latvia?
- 7.4%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Amu (unsdcode:98111) and Latvia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do ECA: Amu (unsdcode:98111) and Latvia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, secondary, both sexes?
- ECA: Amu (unsdcode:98111) ranks 62nd and Latvia ranks 61st of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release