AIMS: Pacific vs Iceland: Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female
AIMS: Pacific
97.3%
in 2024
Iceland
106.3%
in 2023
AIMS: Pacific rank
47th
Iceland rank
45th
Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female over time
- AIMS: Pacific
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 106.3% against 97.3% in AIMS: Pacific, a difference of 9.0%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times AIMS: Pacific's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
AIMS: Pacific ranks 47th and Iceland ranks 45th of 221 groups.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Pacific | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 111.3% | 111.5% | 0.1% | Iceland |
| 2000s | 109.2% | 111.7% | 2.5% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 103.3% | 115.6% | 12.2% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 97.7% | 109.6% | 11.9% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female, AIMS: Pacific or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 106.3% against 97.3% in AIMS: Pacific as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female between AIMS: Pacific and Iceland?
- 9.0%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Pacific and Iceland?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
- How do AIMS: Pacific and Iceland rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female?
- AIMS: Pacific ranks 47th and Iceland ranks 45th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release