Angola vs WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification: Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female

Angola
48.1%
in 2023
WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
45.6%
in 2024
Angola rank
181st
WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification rank
182nd

Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female over time

  • Angola
  • WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
1020304050197019972024

How they compare

Angola currently reports 48.1% against 45.6% in WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification, a difference of 2.5%.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 1971 it was WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification ahead.

Angola ranks 181st and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification ranks 182nd of 212 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification Difference Ahead
1970s 5.9% 8.3% 2.5% WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
1980s 6.3% 11.3% 5.0% WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
1990s 10.3% 22.4% 12.0% WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
2000s 16.2% 28.1% 11.8% WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
2010s 29.5% 38.0% 8.5% WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
2020s 48.8% 45.6% 3.2% Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female, Angola or WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification?
Angola, at 48.1% against 45.6% in WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female between Angola and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification?
2.5%, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification?
16 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Angola and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female?
Angola ranks 181st and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification ranks 182nd of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification: Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-secondary-female-percent/angola/wb-least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-secondary-female-percent/angola/wb-least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Angola vs WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification: Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
433 places, 15,766 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release