Congo vs WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification: Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female

Congo
46.9%
in 2012
WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
45.6%
in 2024
Congo rank
184th
WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification rank
182nd

Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female over time

  • Congo
  • WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
0204060197019972024

How they compare

Congo currently reports 46.9% against 45.6% in WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification, a difference of 1.3%.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 184th and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification ranks 182nd of 212 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification Difference Ahead
1970s 25.3% 8.7% 16.6% Congo
1980s 52.4% 11.9% 40.5% Congo
1990s 41.2% 15.8% 25.4% Congo
2000s 33.9% 26.9% 7.0% Congo
2010s 46.9% 37.7% 9.2% Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female, Congo or WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification?
Congo, at 46.9% against 45.6% in WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification as of 2012.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female between Congo and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification?
1.3%, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification?
25 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2012.
How do Congo and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female?
Congo ranks 184th and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification ranks 182nd of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification: Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-secondary-female-percent/congo-rep/wb-least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-secondary-female-percent/congo-rep/wb-least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Congo vs WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification: Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
433 places, 15,766 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release