ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) vs Zambia: Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female

ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)
48.6%
in 2019
Zambia
59.1%
in 2024
ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) rank
172nd
Zambia rank
171st

Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female over time

  • ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)
  • Zambia
0204060197019972024

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 59.1% against 48.6% in ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427), a difference of 10.5%.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)'s.

Across all 9 years both countries report, ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) has been ahead every year.

ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) ranks 172nd and Zambia ranks 171st of 221 groups.

ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 25.3% 9.1% 16.2% ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)
1980s 27.4% 12.5% 15.0% ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female, ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) or Zambia?
Zambia, at 59.1% against 48.6% in ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female between ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) and Zambia?
10.5%, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) and Zambia?
9 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 1988.
How do ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) and Zambia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female?
ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) ranks 172nd and Zambia ranks 171st of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) vs Zambia: Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-secondary-female-percent/escap-pacific-island-developing-economies-pide-unsdcode-98427/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-secondary-female-percent/escap-pacific-island-developing-economies-pide-unsdcode-98427/zambia/">ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) vs Zambia: Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
433 places, 15,766 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release