ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) vs Uganda: Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female

ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439)
38.0%
in 2022
Uganda
21.5%
in 2007
ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) rank
208th
Uganda rank
206th

Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female over time

  • ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439)
  • Uganda
010203040197019962022

How they compare

ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) currently reports 38.0% against 21.5% in Uganda, a difference of 16.5%.

That makes ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439)'s figure about 1.8 times Uganda's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) has been ahead every year.

ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) ranks 208th and Uganda ranks 206th of 221 groups.

ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) Uganda Difference Ahead
1970s 15.8% 2.3% 13.5% ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439)
1980s 18.5% 4.9% 13.5% ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439)
1990s 17.4% 7.8% 9.6% ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439)
2000s 25.0% 19.2% 5.8% ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female, ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) or Uganda?
ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439), at 38.0% against 21.5% in Uganda as of 2022.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female between ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) and Uganda?
16.5%, with ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) and Uganda?
14 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2007.
How do ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) and Uganda rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female?
ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) ranks 208th and Uganda ranks 206th of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) vs Uganda: Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-secondary-female-percent/escap-wb-low-income-economies-wb-low-unsdcode-98439/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-secondary-female-percent/escap-wb-low-income-economies-wb-low-unsdcode-98439/uganda/">ESCAP: Wb Low Income Economies (wb_low) (unsdcode:98439) vs Uganda: Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
433 places, 15,766 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release