MDG: Caribbean vs Namibia: Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female
MDG: Caribbean
70.2%
in 2024
Namibia
86.4%
in 2024
MDG: Caribbean rank
131st
Namibia rank
132nd
Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female over time
- MDG: Caribbean
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 86.4% against 70.2% in MDG: Caribbean, a difference of 16.2%.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times MDG: Caribbean's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1990 it was MDG: Caribbean ahead.
MDG: Caribbean ranks 131st and Namibia ranks 132nd of 221 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, MDG: Caribbean averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | MDG: Caribbean | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 64.4% | 58.4% | 6.0% | MDG: Caribbean |
| 2000s | 70.4% | 67.2% | 3.2% | MDG: Caribbean |
| 2010s | 72.1% | 79.7% | 7.6% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 71.2% | 86.6% | 15.4% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female, MDG: Caribbean or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 86.4% against 70.2% in MDG: Caribbean as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female between MDG: Caribbean and Namibia?
- 16.2%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for MDG: Caribbean and Namibia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do MDG: Caribbean and Namibia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female?
- MDG: Caribbean ranks 131st and Namibia ranks 132nd of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release