MDG: Oceania vs Zambia: Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female
MDG: Oceania
48.6%
in 2019
Zambia
59.1%
in 2024
MDG: Oceania rank
170th
Zambia rank
171st
Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female over time
- MDG: Oceania
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 59.1% against 48.6% in MDG: Oceania, a difference of 10.5%.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times MDG: Oceania's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, MDG: Oceania has been ahead every year.
MDG: Oceania ranks 170th and Zambia ranks 171st of 221 groups.
MDG: Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | MDG: Oceania | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 25.4% | 9.1% | 16.3% | MDG: Oceania |
| 1980s | 27.5% | 12.5% | 15.1% | MDG: Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female, MDG: Oceania or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 59.1% against 48.6% in MDG: Oceania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female between MDG: Oceania and Zambia?
- 10.5%, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for MDG: Oceania and Zambia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 1988.
- How do MDG: Oceania and Zambia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female?
- MDG: Oceania ranks 170th and Zambia ranks 171st of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release