AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific vs Israel: Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, male
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
91.6%
in 2024
Israel
98.4%
in 2024
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific rank
71st
Israel rank
71st
Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, male over time
- AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 98.4% against 91.6% in AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific, a difference of 6.8%.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 71st and Israel ranks 71st of 221 groups.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.6% | 97.9% | 26.3% | Israel |
| 2010s | 86.0% | 97.7% | 11.8% | Israel |
| 2020s | 90.5% | 98.4% | 7.9% | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, secondary, male, AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific or Israel?
- Israel, at 98.4% against 91.6% in AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, secondary, male between AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Israel?
- 6.8%, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Israel?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Israel rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, secondary, male?
- AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 71st and Israel ranks 71st of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release