Cecc-sica vs Namibia: Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, male
Cecc-sica
61.4%
in 2024
Namibia
77.5%
in 2024
Cecc-sica rank
150th
Namibia rank
147th
Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, male over time
- Cecc-sica
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 77.5% against 61.4% in Cecc-sica, a difference of 16.1%.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Cecc-sica's.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Cecc-sica ranks 150th and Namibia ranks 147th of 221 groups.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cecc-sica | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 36.8% | 50.6% | 13.8% | Namibia |
| 2000s | 52.2% | 61.5% | 9.3% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 63.6% | 72.8% | 9.2% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 60.6% | 78.1% | 17.5% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, secondary, male, Cecc-sica or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 77.5% against 61.4% in Cecc-sica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, secondary, male between Cecc-sica and Namibia?
- 16.1%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cecc-sica and Namibia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cecc-sica and Namibia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, secondary, male?
- Cecc-sica ranks 150th and Namibia ranks 147th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release