ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) vs Timor-Leste: Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, female

ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417)
68.9%
in 2024
Timor-Leste
82.3%
in 2020
ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) rank
110th
Timor-Leste rank
108th

Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, female over time

  • ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417)
  • Timor-Leste
020406080100199920112024

How they compare

Timor-Leste currently reports 82.3% against 68.9% in ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417), a difference of 13.4%.

That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.2 times ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) ahead.

ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) ranks 110th and Timor-Leste ranks 108th of 221 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) averaged higher in 2 and Timor-Leste in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
2000s 84.0% 45.1% 38.9% ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417)
2010s 93.7% 66.8% 26.8% ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417)
2020s 71.1% 82.3% 11.2% Timor-Leste

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, female, ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) or Timor-Leste?
Timor-Leste, at 82.3% against 68.9% in ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) as of 2020.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, female between ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) and Timor-Leste?
13.4%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) and Timor-Leste?
13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2020.
How do ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) and Timor-Leste rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, female?
ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) ranks 110th and Timor-Leste ranks 108th of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) vs Timor-Leste: Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-upper-secondary-female-percent-2/escap-north-and-central-asia-nca-unsdcode-98417/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-upper-secondary-female-percent-2/escap-north-and-central-asia-nca-unsdcode-98417/timor-leste/">ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) vs Timor-Leste: Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
416 places, 10,055 data points, 1986–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release