AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific vs Latvia: Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, male
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
85.4%
in 2024
Latvia
99.3%
in 2024
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific rank
54th
Latvia rank
52nd
Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, male over time
- AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 99.3% against 85.4% in AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific, a difference of 13.9%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 54th and Latvia ranks 52nd of 221 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.4% | 93.9% | 41.5% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 77.5% | 115.0% | 37.5% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 83.5% | 106.0% | 22.5% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, male, AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 99.3% against 85.4% in AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, male between AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Latvia?
- 13.9%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Latvia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Latvia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, male?
- AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 54th and Latvia ranks 52nd of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release