Latvia vs Low & middle income: Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, male
Latvia
115.8%
in 2018
Low & middle income
62.9%
in 2019
Latvia rank
25th
Low & middle income rank
26th
Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, male over time
- Latvia
- Low & middle income
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 115.8% against 62.9% in Low & middle income, a difference of 52.9%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.8 times Low & middle income's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 25th and Low & middle income ranks 26th of 182 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Low & middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 77.3% | 38.4% | 38.8% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 93.5% | 46.1% | 47.4% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 115.2% | 60.7% | 54.4% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, male, Latvia or Low & middle income?
- Latvia, at 115.8% against 62.9% in Low & middle income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, male between Latvia and Low & middle income?
- 52.9%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Low & middle income?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2018.
- How do Latvia and Low & middle income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, male?
- Latvia ranks 25th and Low & middle income ranks 26th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in upper secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the male population of official upper secondary education age.