AIMS: Central Asia vs Malta: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general
AIMS: Central Asia
92.3%
in 2024
Malta
97.3%
in 2023
AIMS: Central Asia rank
49th
Malta rank
49th
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time
- AIMS: Central Asia
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 97.3% against 92.3% in AIMS: Central Asia, a difference of 5.0%.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times AIMS: Central Asia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was AIMS: Central Asia ahead.
AIMS: Central Asia ranks 49th and Malta ranks 49th of 219 groups.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Central Asia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.0% | 94.7% | 3.7% | Malta |
| 2010s | 92.4% | 99.2% | 6.8% | Malta |
| 2020s | 91.6% | 98.1% | 6.5% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, AIMS: Central Asia or Malta?
- Malta, at 97.3% against 92.3% in AIMS: Central Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between AIMS: Central Asia and Malta?
- 5.0%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Central Asia and Malta?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do AIMS: Central Asia and Malta rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
- AIMS: Central Asia ranks 49th and Malta ranks 49th of 219 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release