AIMS: Pacific vs Bangladesh: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general
AIMS: Pacific
68.2%
in 2019
Bangladesh
73.8%
in 2024
AIMS: Pacific rank
132nd
Bangladesh rank
133rd
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time
- AIMS: Pacific
- Bangladesh
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 73.8% against 68.2% in AIMS: Pacific, a difference of 5.6%.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times AIMS: Pacific's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2000 it was AIMS: Pacific ahead.
AIMS: Pacific ranks 132nd and Bangladesh ranks 133rd of 219 groups.
AIMS: Pacific has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Pacific | Bangladesh | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.5% | 54.5% | 12.0% | AIMS: Pacific |
| 2010s | 73.2% | 65.3% | 7.9% | AIMS: Pacific |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, AIMS: Pacific or Bangladesh?
- Bangladesh, at 73.8% against 68.2% in AIMS: Pacific as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between AIMS: Pacific and Bangladesh?
- 5.6%, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Pacific and Bangladesh?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do AIMS: Pacific and Bangladesh rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
- AIMS: Pacific ranks 132nd and Bangladesh ranks 133rd of 219 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release