Belarus vs UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

Belarus
100.8%
in 2024
UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific
97.3%
in 2024
Belarus rank
25th
UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific rank
22nd

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • Belarus
  • UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific
050100150197119972024

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 100.8% against 97.3% in UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific, a difference of 3.5%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 25th and UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific ranks 22nd of 192 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific Difference Ahead
1980s 98.2% 56.6% 41.6% Belarus
1990s 91.9% 61.7% 30.2% Belarus
2000s 107.8% 83.8% 24.0% Belarus
2010s 101.3% 89.7% 11.6% Belarus
2020s 98.0% 95.7% 2.3% Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, Belarus or UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific?
Belarus, at 100.8% against 97.3% in UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between Belarus and UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific?
3.5%, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific?
34 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2024.
How do Belarus and UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
Belarus ranks 25th and UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific ranks 22nd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-both-sexes/belarus/unicef-east-asia-and-pacific/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-both-sexes/belarus/unicef-east-asia-and-pacific/">Belarus vs UNICEF: East Asia and Pacific: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 12,780 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release