China vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

China
103.6%
in 2012
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
97.5%
in 2024
China rank
17th
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank
17th

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • China
  • UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
0255075100198920062024

How they compare

China currently reports 103.6% against 97.5% in UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries, a difference of 6.1%.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 17th and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 17th of 192 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries Difference Ahead
1990s 61.7% 59.6% 2.1% China
2000s 102.3% 91.6% 10.7% China
2010s 102.9% 92.6% 10.3% China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, China or UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
China, at 103.6% against 97.5% in UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries as of 2012.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between China and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
6.1%, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
14 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2012.
How do China and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
China ranks 17th and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 17th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-both-sexes/china/unicef-east-asia-and-the-pacific-programme-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-both-sexes/china/unicef-east-asia-and-the-pacific-programme-countries/">China vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 12,780 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release