Congo vs ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110): Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

Congo
47.9%
in 2012
ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110)
51.2%
in 2024
Congo rank
160th
ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) rank
160th

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • Congo
  • ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110)
1020304050197119972024

How they compare

ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) currently reports 51.2% against 47.9% in Congo, a difference of 3.3%.

That makes ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110)'s figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1973 it was ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) ahead.

Congo ranks 160th and ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) ranks 160th of 192 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) Difference Ahead
1970s 29.6% 24.9% 4.7% Congo
1980s 37.0% 25.6% 11.4% Congo
1990s 29.2% 27.5% 1.7% Congo
2000s 32.8% 34.4% 1.6% ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110)
2010s 43.9% 42.0% 1.9% Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, Congo or ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110)?
ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110), at 51.2% against 47.9% in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between Congo and ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110)?
3.3%, with ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110)?
26 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2012.
How do Congo and ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
Congo ranks 160th and ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110) ranks 160th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110): Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-both-sexes/congo-rep/eca-sadc-unsdcode-98110/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-both-sexes/congo-rep/eca-sadc-unsdcode-98110/">Congo vs ECA: Sadc (unsdcode:98110): Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 12,780 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release