ESCAP: Small Islands Developing States (sids) (unsdcode:98435) vs Zambia: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

ESCAP: Small Islands Developing States (sids) (unsdcode:98435)
56.5%
in 2020
Zambia
55.3%
in 2013
ESCAP: Small Islands Developing States (sids) (unsdcode:98435) rank
152nd
Zambia rank
152nd

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • ESCAP: Small Islands Developing States (sids) (unsdcode:98435)
  • Zambia
20406080197619982020

How they compare

ESCAP: Small Islands Developing States (sids) (unsdcode:98435) currently reports 56.5% against 55.3% in Zambia, a difference of 1.2%.

Across all 12 years both countries report, ESCAP: Small Islands Developing States (sids) (unsdcode:98435) has been ahead every year.

ESCAP: Small Islands Developing States (sids) (unsdcode:98435) ranks 152nd and Zambia ranks 152nd of 219 groups.

ESCAP: Small Islands Developing States (sids) (unsdcode:98435) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ESCAP: Small Islands Developing States (sids) (unsdcode:98435) Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 62.3% 43.5% 18.9% ESCAP: Small Islands Developing States (sids) (unsdcode:98435)
2010s 71.0% 57.0% 14.1% ESCAP: Small Islands Developing States (sids) (unsdcode:98435)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, ESCAP: Small Islands Developing States (sids) (unsdcode:98435) or Zambia?
ESCAP: Small Islands Developing States (sids) (unsdcode:98435), at 56.5% against 55.3% in Zambia as of 2020.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between ESCAP: Small Islands Developing States (sids) (unsdcode:98435) and Zambia?
1.2%, with ESCAP: Small Islands Developing States (sids) (unsdcode:98435) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: Small Islands Developing States (sids) (unsdcode:98435) and Zambia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2013.
How do ESCAP: Small Islands Developing States (sids) (unsdcode:98435) and Zambia rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
ESCAP: Small Islands Developing States (sids) (unsdcode:98435) ranks 152nd and Zambia ranks 152nd of 219 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ESCAP: Small Islands Developing States (sids) (unsdcode:98435) vs Zambia: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-both-sexes/escap-small-islands-developing-states-sids-unsdcode-98435/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-both-sexes/escap-small-islands-developing-states-sids-unsdcode-98435/zambia/">ESCAP: Small Islands Developing States (sids) (unsdcode:98435) vs Zambia: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 12,780 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release