Guinea-Bissau vs WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

Guinea-Bissau
36.3%
in 2010
WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
46.3%
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
174th
WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification rank
175th

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
01020304050197319982023

How they compare

WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification currently reports 46.3% against 36.3% in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 10.0%.

That makes WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification's figure about 1.3 times Guinea-Bissau's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 174th and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification ranks 175th of 192 countries.

WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification Difference Ahead
1970s 2.3% 23.7% 21.4% WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
1980s 4.3% 24.3% 20.0% WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
2000s 13.2% 27.9% 14.8% WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification
2010s 36.3% 37.3% 1.0% WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, Guinea-Bissau or WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification?
WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification, at 46.3% against 36.3% in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between Guinea-Bissau and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification?
10.0%, with WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification?
13 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2010.
How do Guinea-Bissau and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 174th and WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification ranks 175th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-both-sexes/guinea-bissau/wb-least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-both-sexes/guinea-bissau/wb-least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Guinea-Bissau vs WB: Least Developed Countries: Un Classification: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 12,780 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release