MDG: Oceania vs Uganda: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general
MDG: Oceania
44.6%
in 2019
Uganda
26.3%
in 2017
MDG: Oceania rank
182nd
Uganda rank
184th
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time
- MDG: Oceania
- Uganda
How they compare
MDG: Oceania currently reports 44.6% against 26.3% in Uganda, a difference of 18.3%.
That makes MDG: Oceania's figure about 1.7 times Uganda's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, MDG: Oceania has been ahead every year.
MDG: Oceania ranks 182nd and Uganda ranks 184th of 219 groups.
MDG: Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | MDG: Oceania | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.5% | 19.7% | 29.8% | MDG: Oceania |
| 2010s | 62.8% | 27.3% | 35.5% | MDG: Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, MDG: Oceania or Uganda?
- MDG: Oceania, at 44.6% against 26.3% in Uganda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between MDG: Oceania and Uganda?
- 18.3%, with MDG: Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for MDG: Oceania and Uganda?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do MDG: Oceania and Uganda rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
- MDG: Oceania ranks 182nd and Uganda ranks 184th of 219 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release