SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) vs Uganda: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand)
44.6%
in 2019
Uganda
26.3%
in 2017
SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) rank
182nd
Uganda rank
184th

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand)
  • Uganda
0204060197619972019

How they compare

SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) currently reports 44.6% against 26.3% in Uganda, a difference of 18.3%.

That makes SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand)'s figure about 1.7 times Uganda's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) has been ahead every year.

SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) ranks 182nd and Uganda ranks 184th of 219 groups.

SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 49.5% 19.7% 29.8% SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand)
2010s 62.8% 27.3% 35.5% SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) or Uganda?
SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand), at 44.6% against 26.3% in Uganda as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) and Uganda?
18.3%, with SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) and Uganda?
16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
How do SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) and Uganda rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) ranks 182nd and Uganda ranks 184th of 219 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) vs Uganda: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-both-sexes/sdg-oceania-excluding-australia-and-new-zealand/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-both-sexes/sdg-oceania-excluding-australia-and-new-zealand/uganda/">SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) vs Uganda: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 12,780 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release