WB: Middle East & North Africa, Afghanistan, Pakistan vs Zimbabwe: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

WB: Middle East & North Africa, Afghanistan, Pakistan
66.7%
in 2024
Zimbabwe
65.6%
in 2024
WB: Middle East & North Africa, Afghanistan, Pakistan rank
142nd
Zimbabwe rank
139th

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • WB: Middle East & North Africa, Afghanistan, Pakistan
  • Zimbabwe
020406080197419992024

How they compare

WB: Middle East & North Africa, Afghanistan, Pakistan currently reports 66.7% against 65.6% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.1%.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

WB: Middle East & North Africa, Afghanistan, Pakistan ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 139th of 219 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade WB: Middle East & North Africa, Afghanistan, Pakistan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 42.6% 52.5% 9.9% Zimbabwe
2010s 57.9% 63.5% 5.6% Zimbabwe
2020s 63.2% 67.4% 4.2% Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, WB: Middle East & North Africa, Afghanistan, Pakistan or Zimbabwe?
WB: Middle East & North Africa, Afghanistan, Pakistan, at 66.7% against 65.6% in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between WB: Middle East & North Africa, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Zimbabwe?
1.1%, with WB: Middle East & North Africa, Afghanistan, Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for WB: Middle East & North Africa, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Zimbabwe?
14 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2024.
How do WB: Middle East & North Africa, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
WB: Middle East & North Africa, Afghanistan, Pakistan ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 139th of 219 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

WB: Middle East & North Africa, Afghanistan, Pakistan vs Zimbabwe: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-both-sexes/wb-middle-east-and-north-africa-afghanistan-pakistan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-both-sexes/wb-middle-east-and-north-africa-afghanistan-pakistan/zimbabwe/">WB: Middle East & North Africa, Afghanistan, Pakistan vs Zimbabwe: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 12,780 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release