AIMS: Central Asia vs Iceland: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general
AIMS: Central Asia
91.6%
in 2024
Iceland
97.6%
in 2023
AIMS: Central Asia rank
53rd
Iceland rank
51st
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time
- AIMS: Central Asia
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 97.6% against 91.6% in AIMS: Central Asia, a difference of 6.0%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times AIMS: Central Asia's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
AIMS: Central Asia ranks 53rd and Iceland ranks 51st of 219 groups.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Central Asia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.7% | 98.8% | 10.1% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 91.1% | 98.1% | 7.0% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 90.9% | 96.3% | 5.4% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, AIMS: Central Asia or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 97.6% against 91.6% in AIMS: Central Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between AIMS: Central Asia and Iceland?
- 6.0%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Central Asia and Iceland?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do AIMS: Central Asia and Iceland rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
- AIMS: Central Asia ranks 53rd and Iceland ranks 51st of 219 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release