AIMS: East Asia vs Aruba: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general
AIMS: East Asia
98.5%
in 2024
Aruba
104.6%
in 2022
AIMS: East Asia rank
14th
Aruba rank
16th
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time
- AIMS: East Asia
- Aruba
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 104.6% against 98.5% in AIMS: East Asia, a difference of 6.1%.
That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times AIMS: East Asia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Aruba ahead.
AIMS: East Asia ranks 14th and Aruba ranks 16th of 219 groups.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: East Asia | Aruba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 67.8% | 91.1% | 23.3% | Aruba |
| 2000s | 83.3% | 94.3% | 11.0% | Aruba |
| 2010s | 91.1% | 100.1% | 9.0% | Aruba |
| 2020s | 96.5% | 97.0% | 0.6% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, AIMS: East Asia or Aruba?
- Aruba, at 104.6% against 98.5% in AIMS: East Asia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between AIMS: East Asia and Aruba?
- 6.1%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and Aruba?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2022.
- How do AIMS: East Asia and Aruba rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
- AIMS: East Asia ranks 14th and Aruba ranks 16th of 219 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release