AIMS: East Asia vs China: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general
AIMS: East Asia
98.5%
in 2024
China
106.0%
in 2012
AIMS: East Asia rank
14th
China rank
14th
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time
- AIMS: East Asia
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 106.0% against 98.5% in AIMS: East Asia, a difference of 7.5%.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times AIMS: East Asia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 1995 it was AIMS: East Asia ahead.
AIMS: East Asia ranks 14th and China ranks 14th of 219 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, AIMS: East Asia averaged higher in 1 and China in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: East Asia | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 59.8% | 59.7% | 0.1% | AIMS: East Asia |
| 2000s | 92.8% | 103.8% | 11.0% | China |
| 2010s | 94.3% | 105.2% | 11.0% | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, AIMS: East Asia or China?
- China, at 106.0% against 98.5% in AIMS: East Asia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between AIMS: East Asia and China?
- 7.5%, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and China?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2012.
- How do AIMS: East Asia and China rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
- AIMS: East Asia ranks 14th and China ranks 14th of 219 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release