AIMS: Pacific vs El Salvador: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general
AIMS: Pacific
68.2%
in 2019
El Salvador
76.7%
in 2024
AIMS: Pacific rank
138th
El Salvador rank
135th
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time
- AIMS: Pacific
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 76.7% against 68.2% in AIMS: Pacific, a difference of 8.5%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times AIMS: Pacific's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2001 it was AIMS: Pacific ahead.
AIMS: Pacific ranks 138th and El Salvador ranks 135th of 219 groups.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Pacific | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.0% | 70.1% | 2.0% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 72.1% | 78.1% | 6.0% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, AIMS: Pacific or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 76.7% against 68.2% in AIMS: Pacific as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between AIMS: Pacific and El Salvador?
- 8.5%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Pacific and El Salvador?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2018.
- How do AIMS: Pacific and El Salvador rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
- AIMS: Pacific ranks 138th and El Salvador ranks 135th of 219 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release