AIMS: Pacific vs Eswatini: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general
AIMS: Pacific
68.2%
in 2019
Eswatini
72.2%
in 2023
AIMS: Pacific rank
138th
Eswatini rank
138th
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time
- AIMS: Pacific
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 72.2% against 68.2% in AIMS: Pacific, a difference of 4.0%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times AIMS: Pacific's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2001 it was AIMS: Pacific ahead.
AIMS: Pacific ranks 138th and Eswatini ranks 138th of 219 groups.
AIMS: Pacific has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Pacific | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.5% | 38.8% | 28.7% | AIMS: Pacific |
| 2010s | 72.4% | 56.5% | 15.8% | AIMS: Pacific |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, AIMS: Pacific or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 72.2% against 68.2% in AIMS: Pacific as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between AIMS: Pacific and Eswatini?
- 4.0%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Pacific and Eswatini?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2019.
- How do AIMS: Pacific and Eswatini rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
- AIMS: Pacific ranks 138th and Eswatini ranks 138th of 219 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release