AIMS: Pacific vs Nicaragua: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general
AIMS: Pacific
68.2%
in 2019
Nicaragua
69.9%
in 2010
AIMS: Pacific rank
138th
Nicaragua rank
140th
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time
- AIMS: Pacific
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 69.9% against 68.2% in AIMS: Pacific, a difference of 1.7%.
Across all 8 years both countries report, AIMS: Pacific has been ahead every year.
AIMS: Pacific ranks 138th and Nicaragua ranks 140th of 219 groups.
AIMS: Pacific has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Pacific | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.4% | 60.6% | 6.8% | AIMS: Pacific |
| 2010s | 74.2% | 69.9% | 4.3% | AIMS: Pacific |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, AIMS: Pacific or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 69.9% against 68.2% in AIMS: Pacific as of 2010.
- What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between AIMS: Pacific and Nicaragua?
- 1.7%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Pacific and Nicaragua?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2010.
- How do AIMS: Pacific and Nicaragua rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
- AIMS: Pacific ranks 138th and Nicaragua ranks 140th of 219 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release