Albania vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

Albania
104.5%
in 2024
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
98.0%
in 2024
Albania rank
17th
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank
17th

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • Albania
  • UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
0255075100199420092024

How they compare

Albania currently reports 104.5% against 98.0% in UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries, a difference of 6.5%.

That makes Albania's figure about 1.1 times UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Albania ahead.

Albania ranks 17th and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 17th of 192 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 3 and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries Difference Ahead
1990s 89.4% 58.1% 31.3% Albania
2000s 92.0% 84.2% 7.7% Albania
2010s 97.0% 91.7% 5.3% Albania
2020s 95.0% 96.8% 1.8% UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, Albania or UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
Albania, at 104.5% against 98.0% in UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between Albania and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
6.5%, with Albania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
21 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Albania and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
Albania ranks 17th and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 17th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Albania vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-female-percent/albania/unicef-east-asia-and-the-pacific-programme-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-female-percent/albania/unicef-east-asia-and-the-pacific-programme-countries/">Albania vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 11,763 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release