ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) vs Zambia: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)
51.2%
in 2024
Zambia
51.0%
in 2013
ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) rank
160th
Zambia rank
159th

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)
  • Zambia
102030405060197019972024

How they compare

ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) currently reports 51.2% against 51.0% in Zambia, a difference of 0.2%.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1976 it was ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) ahead.

ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) ranks 160th and Zambia ranks 159th of 219 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 24.1% 11.7% 12.3% ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)
2000s 35.1% 39.3% 4.2% Zambia
2010s 42.5% 52.8% 10.3% Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) or Zambia?
ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119), at 51.2% against 51.0% in Zambia as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) and Zambia?
0.2%, with ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) and Zambia?
14 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2013.
How do ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) and Zambia rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) ranks 160th and Zambia ranks 159th of 219 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) vs Zambia: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-female-percent/eca-mineral-rich-countries-unsdcode-98119/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-female-percent/eca-mineral-rich-countries-unsdcode-98119/zambia/">ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) vs Zambia: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 11,763 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release