ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) vs Marshall Islands: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)
100.6%
in 2022
Marshall Islands
117.1%
in 2024
ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) rank
6th
Marshall Islands rank
4th

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)
  • Marshall Islands
5075100125150199420092024

How they compare

Marshall Islands currently reports 117.1% against 100.6% in ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408), a difference of 16.5%.

That makes Marshall Islands's figure about 1.2 times ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)'s.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Marshall Islands ahead.

ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) ranks 6th and Marshall Islands ranks 4th of 219 groups.

Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) Marshall Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 70.7% 111.7% 41.0% Marshall Islands
2000s 96.9% 104.1% 7.2% Marshall Islands
2010s 97.7% 110.3% 12.6% Marshall Islands
2020s 99.8% 114.0% 14.2% Marshall Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) or Marshall Islands?
Marshall Islands, at 117.1% against 100.6% in ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) and Marshall Islands?
16.5%, with Marshall Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) and Marshall Islands?
11 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2022.
How do ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) and Marshall Islands rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) ranks 6th and Marshall Islands ranks 4th of 219 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) vs Marshall Islands: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-female-percent/escap-east-and-north-east-asia-enea-unsdcode-98408/marshall-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-female-percent/escap-east-and-north-east-asia-enea-unsdcode-98408/marshall-islands/">ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) vs Marshall Islands: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 11,763 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release