ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general
ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)
100.6%
in 2022
Turks and Caicos Islands
114.7%
in 2024
ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) rank
6th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
8th
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time
- ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 114.7% against 100.6% in ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408), a difference of 14.1%.
That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)'s.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) ranks 6th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 8th of 219 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) averaged higher in 3 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 63.3% | 90.9% | 27.6% | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2000s | 86.7% | 84.3% | 2.5% | ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) |
| 2010s | 91.2% | 88.7% | 2.5% | ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) |
| 2020s | 100.5% | 86.2% | 14.3% | ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at 114.7% against 100.6% in ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 14.1%, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
- How do ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
- ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) ranks 6th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 8th of 219 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release