ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) vs Zimbabwe: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407)
67.2%
in 2024
Zimbabwe
68.0%
in 2024
ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) rank
141st
Zimbabwe rank
143rd

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407)
  • Zimbabwe
020406080198420042024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 68.0% against 67.2% in ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407), a difference of 0.8%.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) ranks 141st and Zimbabwe ranks 143rd of 219 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 57.2% 62.3% 5.2% Zimbabwe
2020s 62.9% 68.6% 5.7% Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 68.0% against 67.2% in ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) and Zimbabwe?
0.8%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) and Zimbabwe?
13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
How do ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) ranks 141st and Zimbabwe ranks 143rd of 219 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) vs Zimbabwe: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-female-percent/escap-eco-eco-unsdcode-98407/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-female-percent/escap-eco-eco-unsdcode-98407/zimbabwe/">ESCAP: Eco (eco) (unsdcode:98407) vs Zimbabwe: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 11,763 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release