ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) vs Indonesia: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417)
93.7%
in 2020
Indonesia
98.8%
in 2025
ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) rank
44th
Indonesia rank
43rd

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417)
  • Indonesia
0255075100199520102025

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 98.8% against 93.7% in ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417), a difference of 5.1%.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) ahead.

ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) ranks 44th and Indonesia ranks 43rd of 219 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) averaged higher in 1 and Indonesia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) Indonesia Difference Ahead
2000s 87.0% 77.2% 9.7% ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417)
2010s 91.4% 93.9% 2.5% Indonesia
2020s 93.7% 99.4% 5.7% Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) or Indonesia?
Indonesia, at 98.8% against 93.7% in ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) and Indonesia?
5.1%, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) and Indonesia?
19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
How do ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) and Indonesia rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) ranks 44th and Indonesia ranks 43rd of 219 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) vs Indonesia: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-female-percent/escap-north-and-central-asia-nca-unsdcode-98417/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-female-percent/escap-north-and-central-asia-nca-unsdcode-98417/indonesia/">ESCAP: North and Central Asia (nca) (unsdcode:98417) vs Indonesia: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 11,763 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release