Georgia vs UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

Georgia
83.7%
in 2024
UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa
75.6%
in 2024
Georgia rank
120th
UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa rank
119th

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • Georgia
  • UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa
406080100120197620002024

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 83.7% against 75.6% in UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa, a difference of 8.1%.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 120th and UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa ranks 119th of 192 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 93.8% 67.1% 26.7% Georgia
2010s 107.9% 71.3% 36.6% Georgia
2020s 97.6% 74.8% 22.8% Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, Georgia or UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa?
Georgia, at 83.7% against 75.6% in UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between Georgia and UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa?
8.1%, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Georgia and UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
Georgia ranks 120th and UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa ranks 119th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-female-percent/georgia/unicef-middle-east-and-north-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-female-percent/georgia/unicef-middle-east-and-north-africa/">Georgia vs UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 11,763 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release