Nauru vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general
Nauru
104.3%
in 2025
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
98.0%
in 2024
Nauru rank
18th
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank
17th
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time
- Nauru
- UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 104.3% against 98.0% in UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries, a difference of 6.3%.
That makes Nauru's figure about 1.1 times UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1998 it was UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ahead.
Nauru ranks 18th and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 17th of 192 countries.
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 42.9% | 63.7% | 20.9% | UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries |
| 2000s | 32.3% | 76.1% | 43.8% | UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries |
| 2010s | 80.1% | 93.5% | 13.4% | UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries |
| 2020s | 88.6% | 96.9% | 8.3% | UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, Nauru or UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
- Nauru, at 104.3% against 98.0% in UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between Nauru and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
- 6.3%, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
- How do Nauru and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
- Nauru ranks 18th and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 17th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release