SDG: Central and Southern Asia vs East Timor: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

SDG: Central and Southern Asia
81.8%
in 2024
East Timor
92.3%
in 2020
SDG: Central and Southern Asia rank
93rd
East Timor rank
93rd

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • SDG: Central and Southern Asia
  • East Timor
020406080100200120122024

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 92.3% against 81.8% in SDG: Central and Southern Asia, a difference of 10.5%.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1.1 times SDG: Central and Southern Asia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was SDG: Central and Southern Asia ahead.

SDG: Central and Southern Asia ranks 93rd and East Timor ranks 93rd of 219 groups.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade SDG: Central and Southern Asia East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 63.0% 66.1% 3.1% East Timor
2010s 74.9% 84.0% 9.1% East Timor
2020s 81.3% 92.3% 10.9% East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, SDG: Central and Southern Asia or East Timor?
East Timor, at 92.3% against 81.8% in SDG: Central and Southern Asia as of 2020.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between SDG: Central and Southern Asia and East Timor?
10.5%, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for SDG: Central and Southern Asia and East Timor?
11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2020.
How do SDG: Central and Southern Asia and East Timor rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
SDG: Central and Southern Asia ranks 93rd and East Timor ranks 93rd of 219 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

SDG: Central and Southern Asia vs East Timor: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-female-percent/sdg-central-and-southern-asia/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-female-percent/sdg-central-and-southern-asia/timor-leste/">SDG: Central and Southern Asia vs East Timor: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 11,763 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release