Afghanistan vs SDG: Oceania: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general
Afghanistan
71.5%
in 2023
SDG: Oceania
68.1%
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
130th
SDG: Oceania rank
130th
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time
- Afghanistan
- SDG: Oceania
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 71.5% against 68.1% in SDG: Oceania, a difference of 3.4%.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times SDG: Oceania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2005 it was SDG: Oceania ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 130th and SDG: Oceania ranks 130th of 192 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and SDG: Oceania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | SDG: Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.8% | 67.5% | 42.6% | SDG: Oceania |
| 2010s | 70.6% | 69.2% | 1.4% | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, Afghanistan or SDG: Oceania?
- Afghanistan, at 71.5% against 68.1% in SDG: Oceania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between Afghanistan and SDG: Oceania?
- 3.4%, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and SDG: Oceania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and SDG: Oceania rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
- Afghanistan ranks 130th and SDG: Oceania ranks 130th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release