AIMS: Central Asia vs Israel: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general
AIMS: Central Asia
93.1%
in 2024
Israel
97.6%
in 2024
AIMS: Central Asia rank
45th
Israel rank
44th
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time
- AIMS: Central Asia
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 97.6% against 93.1% in AIMS: Central Asia, a difference of 4.5%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Israel ahead.
AIMS: Central Asia ranks 45th and Israel ranks 44th of 219 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, AIMS: Central Asia averaged higher in 1 and Israel in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Central Asia | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 93.7% | 91.7% | 2.0% | AIMS: Central Asia |
| 2010s | 93.7% | 96.0% | 2.3% | Israel |
| 2020s | 92.4% | 97.0% | 4.6% | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, AIMS: Central Asia or Israel?
- Israel, at 97.6% against 93.1% in AIMS: Central Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between AIMS: Central Asia and Israel?
- 4.5%, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Central Asia and Israel?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: Central Asia and Israel rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
- AIMS: Central Asia ranks 45th and Israel ranks 44th of 219 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release