AIMS: Central Asia vs Malta: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general
AIMS: Central Asia
93.1%
in 2024
Malta
97.7%
in 2023
AIMS: Central Asia rank
45th
Malta rank
43rd
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time
- AIMS: Central Asia
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 97.7% against 93.1% in AIMS: Central Asia, a difference of 4.6%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was AIMS: Central Asia ahead.
AIMS: Central Asia ranks 45th and Malta ranks 43rd of 219 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, AIMS: Central Asia averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Central Asia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 93.2% | 92.9% | 0.3% | AIMS: Central Asia |
| 2010s | 93.7% | 97.8% | 4.1% | Malta |
| 2020s | 92.3% | 98.4% | 6.1% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, AIMS: Central Asia or Malta?
- Malta, at 97.7% against 93.1% in AIMS: Central Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between AIMS: Central Asia and Malta?
- 4.6%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Central Asia and Malta?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do AIMS: Central Asia and Malta rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
- AIMS: Central Asia ranks 45th and Malta ranks 43rd of 219 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release