AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific vs Belarus: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
96.9%
in 2024
Belarus
101.2%
in 2024
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific rank
20th
Belarus rank
19th

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
  • Belarus
050100150199320082024

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 101.2% against 96.9% in AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific, a difference of 4.3%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Belarus ahead.

AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 20th and Belarus ranks 19th of 219 groups.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific Belarus Difference Ahead
1990s 65.9% 90.0% 24.1% Belarus
2000s 83.9% 109.1% 25.2% Belarus
2010s 87.9% 101.3% 13.4% Belarus
2020s 95.0% 98.3% 3.4% Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific or Belarus?
Belarus, at 101.2% against 96.9% in AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Belarus?
4.3%, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Belarus?
28 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Belarus rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 20th and Belarus ranks 19th of 219 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific vs Belarus: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-male-percent/aims-east-asia-and-the-pacific/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-male-percent/aims-east-asia-and-the-pacific/belarus/">AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific vs Belarus: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, male (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 11,761 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release