Aruba vs ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408): Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

Aruba
109.6%
in 2022
ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)
98.5%
in 2022
Aruba rank
9th
ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) rank
10th

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • Aruba
  • ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)
0255075100125199420082022

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 109.6% against 98.5% in ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408), a difference of 11.1%.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)'s.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 9th and ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) ranks 10th of 192 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) Difference Ahead
1990s 91.8% 75.1% 16.7% Aruba
2000s 95.8% 89.7% 6.1% Aruba
2010s 90.9% 91.9% 1.1% ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)
2020s 95.6% 97.9% 2.3% ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, Aruba or ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)?
Aruba, at 109.6% against 98.5% in ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) as of 2022.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between Aruba and ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)?
11.1%, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)?
16 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2022.
How do Aruba and ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
Aruba ranks 9th and ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) ranks 10th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408): Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-male-percent/aruba/escap-east-and-north-east-asia-enea-unsdcode-98408/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-male-percent/aruba/escap-east-and-north-east-asia-enea-unsdcode-98408/">Aruba vs ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408): Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, male (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 11,761 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release