Belarus vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

Belarus
101.2%
in 2024
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
97.1%
in 2024
Belarus rank
19th
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank
17th

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • Belarus
  • UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
050100150199320082024

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 101.2% against 97.1% in UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries, a difference of 4.1%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 19th and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 17th of 192 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries Difference Ahead
1990s 90.0% 65.0% 25.0% Belarus
2000s 109.1% 83.9% 25.1% Belarus
2010s 101.3% 87.9% 13.4% Belarus
2020s 98.3% 95.2% 3.1% Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, Belarus or UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
Belarus, at 101.2% against 97.1% in UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between Belarus and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
4.1%, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
28 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Belarus and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
Belarus ranks 19th and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 17th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-male-percent/belarus/unicef-east-asia-and-the-pacific-programme-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-male-percent/belarus/unicef-east-asia-and-the-pacific-programme-countries/">Belarus vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, male (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 11,761 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release