Cecc-sica vs Congo: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general
Cecc-sica
51.0%
in 2024
Congo
48.6%
in 2012
Cecc-sica rank
161st
Congo rank
159th
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time
- Cecc-sica
- Congo
How they compare
Cecc-sica currently reports 51.0% against 48.6% in Congo, a difference of 2.4%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Cecc-sica ahead.
Cecc-sica ranks 161st and Congo ranks 159th of 219 groups.
Across the 5 decades both report, Cecc-sica averaged higher in 3 and Congo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cecc-sica | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 24.5% | 35.8% | 11.3% | Congo |
| 1980s | 28.6% | 46.5% | 17.9% | Congo |
| 1990s | 33.2% | 32.0% | 1.3% | Cecc-sica |
| 2000s | 45.8% | 37.8% | 8.0% | Cecc-sica |
| 2010s | 57.5% | 46.0% | 11.5% | Cecc-sica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, Cecc-sica or Congo?
- Cecc-sica, at 51.0% against 48.6% in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between Cecc-sica and Congo?
- 2.4%, with Cecc-sica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cecc-sica and Congo?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2012.
- How do Cecc-sica and Congo rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
- Cecc-sica ranks 161st and Congo ranks 159th of 219 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release