Macao vs UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

Macao
95.7%
in 2024
UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries
91.0%
in 2023
Macao rank
56th
UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries rank
58th

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • Macao
  • UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries
0255075100199920112024

How they compare

Macao currently reports 95.7% against 91.0% in UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries, a difference of 4.7%.

That makes Macao's figure about 1.1 times UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries ahead.

Macao ranks 56th and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries ranks 58th of 192 countries.

UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries Difference Ahead
2000s 80.7% 94.8% 14.1% UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries
2010s 91.9% 96.0% 4.1% UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries
2020s 88.6% 94.4% 5.9% UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, Macao or UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries?
Macao, at 95.7% against 91.0% in UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between Macao and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries?
4.7%, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Macao and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
Macao ranks 56th and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries ranks 58th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macao vs UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-male-percent/macao-sar-china/unicef-europe-and-central-asia-programme-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-male-percent/macao-sar-china/unicef-europe-and-central-asia-programme-countries/">Macao vs UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, male (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 11,761 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release