MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia vs Tonga: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia
92.1%
in 2024
Tonga
96.8%
in 2024
MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia rank
51st
Tonga rank
50th

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia
  • Tonga
0255075100198220032024

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 96.8% against 92.1% in MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia, a difference of 4.7%.

That makes Tonga's figure about 1.1 times MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1999 it was MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia ahead.

MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia ranks 51st and Tonga ranks 50th of 219 groups.

MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia Tonga Difference Ahead
1990s 84.2% 74.2% 9.9% MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia
2000s 90.8% 77.2% 13.6% MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia
2020s 92.2% 85.4% 6.8% MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia or Tonga?
Tonga, at 96.8% against 92.1% in MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia and Tonga?
4.7%, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia and Tonga?
8 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
How do MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia and Tonga rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia ranks 51st and Tonga ranks 50th of 219 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia vs Tonga: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-male-percent/mdg-caucasus-and-central-asia/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-male-percent/mdg-caucasus-and-central-asia/tonga/">MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia vs Tonga: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, male (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 11,761 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release