Tanzania vs UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas): Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

Tanzania
32.4%
in 2024
UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas)
46.9%
in 2024
Tanzania rank
175th
UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas) rank
178th

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • Tanzania
  • UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas)
1020304050197019972024

How they compare

UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas) currently reports 46.9% against 32.4% in Tanzania, a difference of 14.5%.

That makes UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas)'s figure about 1.4 times Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas) ahead.

Tanzania ranks 175th and UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas) ranks 178th of 192 countries.

UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas) Difference Ahead
2000s 12.2% 29.0% 16.8% UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas)
2010s 34.6% 43.5% 8.8% UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas)
2020s 32.6% 47.2% 14.6% UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, Tanzania or UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas)?
UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas), at 46.9% against 32.4% in Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between Tanzania and UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas)?
14.5%, with UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas)?
16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Tanzania and UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas) rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
Tanzania ranks 175th and UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas) ranks 178th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania vs UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas): Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-male-percent/tanzania/unicef-economic-community-of-central-african-states-eccas/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-male-percent/tanzania/unicef-economic-community-of-central-african-states-eccas/">Tanzania vs UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas): Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, male (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 11,761 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release