AIMS: Pacific vs Macau, China: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, both sexes
AIMS: Pacific
90.9%
in 2019
Macau, China
94.1%
in 2024
AIMS: Pacific rank
105th
Macau, China rank
102nd
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, both sexes over time
- AIMS: Pacific
- Macau, China
How they compare
Macau, China currently reports 94.1% against 90.9% in AIMS: Pacific, a difference of 3.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Macau, China ahead.
AIMS: Pacific ranks 105th and Macau, China ranks 102nd of 219 groups.
Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Pacific | Macau, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.0% | 96.4% | 12.4% | Macau, China |
| 2010s | 87.7% | 96.7% | 9.0% | Macau, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, both sexes, AIMS: Pacific or Macau, China?
- Macau, China, at 94.1% against 90.9% in AIMS: Pacific as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, both sexes between AIMS: Pacific and Macau, China?
- 3.2%, with Macau, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Pacific and Macau, China?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2019.
- How do AIMS: Pacific and Macau, China rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, both sexes?
- AIMS: Pacific ranks 105th and Macau, China ranks 102nd of 219 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release