ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) vs Macau, China: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, both sexes

ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103)
90.9%
in 2024
Macau, China
94.1%
in 2024
ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) rank
103rd
Macau, China rank
102nd

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, both sexes over time

  • ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103)
  • Macau, China
0255075100197019972024

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 94.1% against 90.9% in ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103), a difference of 3.2%.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) ranks 103rd and Macau, China ranks 102nd of 219 groups.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) Macau, China Difference Ahead
2000s 79.9% 96.4% 16.6% Macau, China
2010s 82.4% 96.7% 14.3% Macau, China
2020s 87.6% 92.1% 4.5% Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, both sexes, ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 94.1% against 90.9% in ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, both sexes between ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) and Macau, China?
3.2%, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) and Macau, China?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) and Macau, China rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, both sexes?
ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) ranks 103rd and Macau, China ranks 102nd of 219 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) vs Macau, China: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, both sexes. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-primary-education-both-sexes-percent/eca-north-africa-unsdcode-98103/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-primary-education-both-sexes-percent/eca-north-africa-unsdcode-98103/macao-sar-china/">ECA: North Africa (unsdcode:98103) vs Macau, China: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, both sexes</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
417 places, 14,076 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release